Skip to content
Diese Seite gibt es auch auf Deutsch.Zur deutschen Version

Travel & Lifestyle · Destinations & trends

Coolcation: Why Summer Holidays Are Heading North

Coolcation instead of heatwaves: why northern destinations are booming, what Norway, Iceland and co. really cost, and how to plan the trip properly.

By Boaz Lichtenstein

Article image: Coolcation: Why Summer Holidays Are Heading North

There’s a photo that sums up present-day summer tourism: people pressed against walls in Rome at 2pm, hunting for a metre of shade. Mediterranean summers of 40 degrees have gone from outlier to expectation – and travellers are drawing conclusions. Searches for so-called coolcations have, according to booking-platform data, risen by roughly three-quarters within a year. Iceland instead of Italy, Sweden instead of Spain: the summer holiday is moving north.

Key takeaways

  • Coolcation searches have risen sharply within a year according to booking platforms – a direct reaction to increasingly hot Mediterranean summers.
  • Among the strongest winners are destinations such as Iceland, Norway, Slovenia, Switzerland and Wales – summer niche destinations only a few years ago.
  • Cool destinations can be sorted by type: vastness and drama, water without a heat shock, mountains and active programmes, tight budgets.
  • Self-catering, cabins instead of hotels and early booking make even expensive northern countries manageable.
  • Combining shoulder-season thinking with northern destinations means travelling doubly countercyclically – to where it’s pleasant, when it’s quiet.

Why the trend is here to stay

Coolcation isn’t a passing fad but an adaptation to real summers: heatwaves are increasingly turning classic destinations in July and August into a burden – for families with young children, for active travellers, for anyone with more planned than the walk from the pool to the air conditioning. At the same time, the north delivers exactly what travellers, according to surveys, increasingly want: nature, space, fewer people.

The effect reinforces itself. The more unpleasant Mediterranean peak season becomes, the more travellers divert – and the more infrastructure (flight connections, accommodation, activities) emerges in the cooler destinations, which in turn makes them easier to reach. Alongside the coasts, it’s precisely Iceland, Norway, Slovenia, Switzerland and Wales that show the strongest growth – regions long considered shoulder-season destinations or specialist hiking territory on the travel calendar, now in demand at peak summer too.

Airlines and tour operators are responding noticeably too: new direct routes to cities such as Bergen, Tromsø or Ljubljana in summer schedules aren’t coincidences, but a bet on exactly this demand shift. For travellers, that practically means more choice and tendentially falling prices once several airlines start competing on the same route – an effect likely to strengthen rather than weaken in the coming years, should southern summers keep getting hotter.

Destinations, sorted by type

The right coolcation depends less on the country than on the experience you’re after: whoever is looking for vastness, water, mountains or a small budget will find a matching cluster of destinations up north for every type – worth sorting before you start scanning the map.

For vastness and drama: Norway’s fjords and the Lofoten Islands, Iceland’s highlands – long days, cool air, landscapes that know no heat.

For water without a heat shock: the Swedish archipelago, Finland’s lake district, the Danish North Sea coast – summer bathing for people who consider 19-degree water refreshing rather than a dare.

For mountains and an active programme: Slovenia (the Julian Alps, the Soča Valley) and Switzerland as established choices, Wales as an underrated hiking alternative.

For a small budget: the Polish Baltic coast, the Masurian lake district and the Baltic states – cool summers, honest prices, surprisingly empty beaches.

For city breaks without heat build-up: Copenhagen, Helsinki and Edinburgh offer culture and food programmes at summer temperatures that still allow sightseeing well into the afternoon – more on this in our overview of underrated city breaks in Europe.

What a coolcation costs

The north is on average pricier than the south – but the spread between destinations is wide, and the biggest lever isn’t the country, it’s your travel style. Self-catering, cabins instead of hotels and the free headline attraction – nature – pull the budget well below what the region’s reputation might suggest.

As rough guide figures for two people per day, excluding travel to get there:

Destination Price level Biggest savings lever Daily budget (rough)
Norway (fjords) high Self-catering, cabins instead of hotels £100–135
Iceland high Camping, round trip instead of full hire-car spree £110–145
Switzerland very high Self-catering huts, hiking instead of cable cars £120–160
Slovenia medium Holiday apartment instead of hotel £70–95
Baltic coast, Poland, Baltic states low to medium barely needed £50–75

These figures vary considerably with season, region and choice of accommodation – treat them as a guide for shortlisting, not a guarantee. By far the largest single item is usually travel plus the hire car, not eating locally.

As a rough example calculation for two weeks in Norway for two people with self-catering: 14 days at around €140 on-the-ground budget adds up to roughly €1,960, plus flights and a hire car typically adding a further €600 to €900 – bringing the total to roughly €2,600 to €2,900. For comparison: the same two weeks on the Polish Baltic coast, with on-the-ground costs of around €1,000 plus travel, often come in at less than half that, with comparable calm and similarly moderate temperatures.

How to plan it properly

A successful coolcation differs from a rain-soaked compromise through preparation, not luck – working through the following steps before booking significantly reduces the risk of disappointment:

  1. Plan for a weather window, not a weather guarantee – keep activities flexible rather than pinning them to a single day.
  2. Set a plan B for rainy days – museums, saunas and thermal baths are part of northern culture, not a last resort.
  3. Pack layers, not just swimwear – the system from our article on the carry-on-only system works here too, just with one extra merino layer.
  4. Rough out the budget in advance – see the table above, including hire cars and ferries, which are often underestimated.
  5. Book early – the north has less bed capacity than the Mediterranean machine; the best accommodation in fjord and Lofoten locations sells out early for peak summer.
  6. Check the shoulder season – June and September are often quieter, cheaper and barely worse weather-wise than peak summer.
  7. Build in a return buffer – with weather risk, a spare day before the flight home beats a missed connection.

From experience: the mistake that trips up coolcation first-timers most often is transplanting the Mediterranean rhythm to the north – getting up late, sitting out the midday heat, getting active in the evening. Up north, it’s the reverse: the bright, often calm morning hours are meteorologically the most reliable, while cloud and wind tend to build up over the course of the day. Whoever schedules hikes and excursions for the morning has noticeably better odds of clear views than the afternoon planners.

Coolcation or classic? A decision guide

Not every summer calls for the north – the decision depends on your travel group, budget and what you’re actually after on holiday. An honest checklist helps more than following the trend blindly:

  • Families with young children: coolcation, because heatwaves carry more health risk for children and long days offer more windows for activities.
  • A pure beach-and-pool week wanted: classic, because the north is simply the wrong product for that.
  • Active holidays with hiking, cycling, water sports: coolcation, because heat forces active programmes in the south into the early morning hours.
  • Tight budget, no compromise on guaranteed sun: classic with a shoulder-season discount beats an expensive northern peak summer.
  • Wanting little hustle and bustle: coolcation, because infrastructure up north hasn’t caught up with demand in every corner yet.

The bottom line

The coolcation trend isn’t a whim but a rational response to summers becoming increasingly uncomfortable in the south – and it will stick around as long as that holds. Whoever self-caters instead of eating out constantly, books early and factors in the shoulder season gets world-class landscapes without a world-class price. The most pragmatic first step: pick a destination type from the list above, use the table as a budget guide, and book peak-summer accommodation now rather than in May.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Isn't a coolcation just swapping heat risk for rain risk?

The risk shifts, it doesn't disappear: instead of heatwaves, you're budgeting for rainy days. The difference is that a jacket and a backup plan solve rain, while only air-conditioned interiors solve 40-degree heat. Scandinavian summers also tend to deliver steadier, warmer weeks than their reputation suggests – 20 to 25 degrees and long days are more the rule than the exception.

Aren't Norway and Iceland extremely expensive?

Price levels are high, but manageable: self-catering instead of full restaurant service, camping or cabins instead of city hotels, and the actual reason for the trip – nature – costs nothing. Cheaper coolcation alternatives include the Baltic coast, Poland, the Baltic states and Slovenia, where cool weather doesn't come with Scandinavian price tags.

When is the best time to travel for a coolcation?

Peak summer (July, August) is both the most expensive and the busiest time up north – exactly the weeks when beds get scarce there too. June and September often still bring pleasant temperatures, noticeably fewer crowds and lower prices. Only in the far north (Lofoten, the Icelandic highlands) is it worth checking the weather history closely, because the season is shorter there.

Do I definitely need a hire car for Norway or Iceland?

For fjords, highlands and remote hiking destinations, pretty much yes – public transport there is built for long-distance links between cities, not for side roads. If you stick to individual regions or cities such as Bergen, Reykjavík or Stockholm, you'll manage fine without a car. For round trips off the main routes, the hire car is the single biggest line item in the budget – and at the same time the reason the landscape is reachable at all.